FROM THE HISTORY OF THE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN AND CHINESE EMPIRES ON THE ISSUE OF EAST TURKESTAN IN THE XIX CENTURY
Abstract
In the 21st century, the scientific study of the history of colonial policy pursued by the great empires on the basis of modern approaches has not lost its relevance. Their policies in different regions have led to political, economic and cultural changes as well as conflicts of interest. In particular, in the XVIII century in Central Asia there was a sharp political process. Not only will there be military conflicts in the region, but the political interests of several major empires will clash in the region. In particular, the growing economic potential of the Russian Empire increased its aspirations for East Turkestan, and on the other hand, after the Manchu dynasty took the Chinese throne, their bold move to the region aggravated the political situation. The short-lived occupation of Mongolia, Tibet, Lobnor, and the present-day Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region by the Qing Empire resulted in the abolition of the centuries-old statehood of the peoples of Central Asia. In this sense, the occupation of East Turkestan by the Manchus was the responsibility of the Russian Empire and the Chinese administration.
Keywords
Central Asia, Gulja and Chuguchak, Kokand Khanate, the Fergana Valley and Kashgar,, East Turkestan,, Semipalatinsk, Petropavlovsk,, Troitsk.How to Cite
References
Ураков, Д. Ж. (2005). Официальные отчеты российской администрации в Туркестане как исторический источник:(конец XIX-начало XX вв.).
Jamoliddinovich, U. D. (2020). Conflict Of Interests Of Major Empires In Central Asia In The Middle Of The Xix Century. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(5), 18-22.
Bahrom, K., Ravshan, T., & Dilshodbek, U. (2019). Theoretical-Methodological Basis Of Studying Of The History Of Uighurs In Uzbekistan According To Diasporas. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 3338-3343.
Ураков, Д. Д. (2017). АНГЛО-РУССКАЯ БОРЬБА ЗА ПАМИР И УСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ЗДЕСЬ ВЛАСТИ РОССИЙСКОЙ ИМПЕРИИ. Theoretical & Applied Science, (1), 43-47.
Ураков, Д. Д. (2015). НЕКОТОРЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ИСТОРИИ ВНЕШНЕПОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ СНОШЕНИЙ ТУРКЕСТАНСКОГО ГЕНЕРАЛ-ГУБЕРНАТОРСТВА (середина 60-х–начало 80-х гг. XIX века). Россия и Европа: связь культуры и экономики, 13.
Ураков, Д. Ж. Из истории формирования Центральноазиатских границ Российской империи («Памирский вопрос»).
Хайназаров, Б. Б. (2017). РОЛЬ РУССКИХ ВОСТОКОВЕДОВ В ИЗУЧЕНИИ ИСТОРИИ УЙГУРОВ. In Инновации в технологиях и образовании (pp. 71-74).
Bahrom, K., Ravshan, T., & Dilshodbek, U. (2019). Theoretical-Methodological Basis Of Studying Of The History Of Uighurs In Uzbekistan According To Diasporas. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 3338-3343.
ХАЙНАЗАРОВ, Б. Б. (2021). ХIХ АСРДА ШАРҚИЙ ТУРКИСТОН МАСАЛАСИ БЎЙИЧА РОССИЯ ВА ХИТОЙ ИМПЕРИЯЛАРИ ЎРТАСИДАГИ КЕЛИШУВЛАРИ ТАРИХИДАН. In Uzbek Conference Publishing Hub (Vol. 1, No. 01, pp. 358-361).
Baxromjon, X., & Hasanovich, P. A. (2020). ROLE OF RUSSIAN ORIENTAL SCIENCES IN STUDYING UIGURS IN THE LATE XIX-XX CENTURIES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCOURSE ON INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND EDUCATION, 1(3), 153-158.
Хайназаров, Б. Б. (2017). Изучение истории уйгур Центральной Азии 30-70-х годов XX века. Проблемы современной науки и образования, (12 (94)).
Muminov, A. G., Nazarov, K., Xaynazarov, B., Polvonov, H., & Ktaybekov, S. (2020). Leading tendencies in the development of cultural and spiritual identity of the peoples of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 5525-5538.
Хайназаров, Ь. Б. (2017). ИЗ ИСТОРИИ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ УЙГУРСКОЙ ДИАСПОРЫ В УЗБЕКИСТАНЕ. Theoretical & Applied Science, (3), 51-55.
Bahrom, K., Ravshan, T., & Dilshodbek, U. (2019). Theoretical-Methodological Basis Of Studying Of The History Of Uighurs In Uzbekistan According To Diasporas. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 3338-3343.
Kozhirova S.B. Russian-Chinese trade in Central Asia (second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries). Astana, 2000, pp. 35-44.
Russian-Chinese relations. 1689-1916. Official documents. M., 1958.p. 35.
Formation of the border between Russia and Qing China. Book. IV.M., 1970. p. 589.
The Dungan uprising and the “Crisis” in Russian-Chinese relations, see: B.P. Gurevich The history of the "Ili question" and its Chinese falsifiers // Documents refute, against falsification of the history of Russian-Chinese relations. M., 1982.S. 423-459; He's the same. International relations in Central Asia in the 17th - first half of the 19th century. M., 1983; Voskresensky A.D. Diplomatic history of the Russian-Chinese St. Petersburg Treaty of 1881. M., 1995 etc.
See also about James the Prince and the attitude towards him in his state and in British politics: Khalfin N.A. English colonial policy in the Middle East (70s of the XIX century). T., 1957.-p. 31-44.
Moiseev. IN AND. Russia and China in Central Asia. Barnaul, 2003.-p. 190