Skip to main content
editor@masterjournals.com | Master Journals Journal Home
Login

Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2767-3758
Published Article

COGNITIVE DEPTHS UNVEILED: EXAMINING PROCESSING VARIATIONS AND IRANIAN LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF ENGLISH INVERSION STRUCTURES ACROSS VARIED INSTRUCTIONAL CONDITIONS

COGNITIVE DEPTHS UNVEILED: EXAMINING PROCESSING VARIATIONS AND IRANIAN LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF ENGLISH INVERSION STRUCTURES ACROSS VARIED INSTRUCTIONAL CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Sara Kaivanpanah
    Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Alavi
    Professor of Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-05-01-01

Keywords:

Cognitive Processing English Inversion Structures Iranian Learners

Abstract

This research delves into the intricacies of cognitive processing variations among Iranian learners when interpreting English inversion structures under different instructional conditions. Titled "Cognitive Depths Unveiled," the study investigates the impact of diverse instructional approaches on learners' comprehension of inversion structures. Through a multifaceted exploration involving linguistic analysis, cognitive psychology, and instructional methodology, this research seeks to unravel the depths of cognitive processing and enhance our understanding of effective pedagogical strategies for teaching inversion structures in English as a second language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai‟i Press.

Baleghizade, S., & Saharkhiz, A. (2013). An investigation of spoken output and intervention types among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(12), 17-41.

Cho, M. Y. (2010). The effects of input enhancement and written recall on noticing and acquisition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 71-87.

Cowan, R. (2008). The teacher’s grammar of English: A course book and reference guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.

Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 256-310). New York: Basil Blackwell.

Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 87-105.

Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focused instruction and second language learning (pp. 1-46). Malden, MA: Blackwell.