Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-05-04-05

ISSUES OF LINGUOPOETIC ANALYSIS IN MODERN POETRY

Eshboyeva Tursuntosh Sokhatmamatovna , Foundation doctoral student, Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines the features of weight and rhyme in literary translation, focusing on poetic translation. Various aspects of artistic translation, in particular, are focused on the relation to other forms of poetic translation (synchronous, scientific-technical, political-journalistic and information-analytical translation of materials). The most important thing is creativity, which is very important in poetic translation, which is the center of analysis of this article. In addition, great attention is paid to the issue of tone.

Keywords

poetry, rhyme scheme, literary activity

References

Bekova N. Poetics of praise in Navoi's poetry. - Tashkent: Science, 2007. - 204 p.

Hamidov H., Salimova Z. On the problems of poetic translation from Uzbek to Turkish. // Oriental translation studies: history, present and future. - T.: ToshDShI, 2013

Rustamov. A Etiquette from the Etiquette of Writers. - Tashkent: Ma'naviyat, 2003. - 108 p.

Safarov Sh. Cognitive linguistics. -Jizzakh: Sangzor, 2006. -14 p.

Salomov G., Jorayev K., Olimov S. The art of translation. Book 4. Collector

Salomov G'., Komilov N. Skills of a translator. - T.: Science, 1979. - P. 30.

Zorayev.T Literature and Art, - Tashkent: 1978. - Page 134.

www.fikr.uz

www.ziyouz.com/index

Kholbekova B. Criterion of poetic translation.// World literature. - T., 2009 No. 11.

Bertels E.E. Selected works. Navoi and Jami. − Moscow: Nauka, 1965. − 325 p.

Zhirmunsky V. Theory of Literature. Poetics. Stylistics. − Leningrad: Nauka, 1972. − 407 p.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Eshboyeva Tursuntosh Sokhatmamatovna. (2024). ISSUES OF LINGUOPOETIC ANALYSIS IN MODERN POETRY. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(04), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-05-04-05