Skip to main content
editor@masterjournals.com | Master Journals Journal Home

Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2767-3758
Published Article

Typology Of Polysemy Of Terms And Its Linguistic Features

Typology Of Polysemy Of Terms And Its Linguistic Features

  • Khudoyberdiyeva Gulmira
    Termez state university Termez, Uzbekistan
polysemy conceptual polysemy Term

This article analyzes the phenomenon of polysemy in terminology and its typological classification. It is demonstrated that the existence of polysemy in terminology, as a special layer of the lexicon, is a natural linguistic phenomenon. The study identifies and distinguishes various forms of polysemy. According to the author’s conclusion, the polysemy of terms is not only a source of ambiguity but also an important indicator of the flexibility and dynamic development of scientific language. Its typological analysis has not only theoretical significance but also considerable practical value — in terminography, translation practice, and educational processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Grinev-Grinevich S.V. Terminovedenie. M., 2008 [29].

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980 [30].

Baxtin M.M. Problema rechevyx zhanrov [Tekst] / M.M. Baxtin // Baxtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1984. — S. 250–296.

Borlykova, B. X. «Polisemiya v kalmytskoy muzykal’noy terminologii.» Vestnik KIGI RAN, № 4 (2013): 47–52.

Gorodetskiy B.Yu. Deyatel’nostnaya terminografiya i perevodcheskaya praktika. M.: RAN, 2006 [26].

Zimovaya M.V. Mnogoznachimost’ v terminologii: dis… kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01 – Russkiy yazyk. Orel, 2010. – 160 s [27][28].

Kiseleva S.V., Rosyanova T.S. K postroeniyu tipologii mnogoznachnosti terminov // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2013. № 4 (37). S. 115–122.

Kiseleva, S.V. «Obzor po kognitivnomu issledovaniyu vnutriotraslevoy polisemii.» S. 43–52.

Lantyuxova, N.N., O.V. Zagorovskaya va T.A. Litvinova. “Termin: opredelenie ponyatiya i ego sushchnostnye priznaki.” Vestnik Voronejskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii 1, № 6 (2013): 42–45.

Leychik V.M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura. 3-e izd. M.: LIBROKOM, 2019 [29].

Mechkovskaya N.B. Sotsial’naya lingvistika. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2000. S. 136–137 [4].

Mechkovskaya N.B. Termin kak «sluga dvux gospod» // Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2000, № 4. S. 135–138 [4].

Pchel’tseva, T.V. Metafora v nauke: filosofsko-metodologicheskiy analiz. Moskva, 2008.

Jakobson R.O. Selected Writings (II: Word and Language). The Hague: Mouton, 1971 [21].

Reformatskiy A.A. Vvedenie v yazykoznanie. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1961.

Tatarinov V.A. Novye slova i terminologiya. M.: Nauka, 1996 [31].

Tarnaeva L.P., Malinina S.M., «Osobennosti terminologicheskogo sostava angloyazychnogo diskursa sudovozhdeniya,» Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki 17, № 2 (2024). Izdatel’stvo «Gramota».