Typology Of Polysemy Of Terms And Its Linguistic Features

Authors

  • Khudoyberdiyeva Gulmira Termez state university Termez, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-06-09-03

Keywords:

polysemy, conceptual polysemy, Term

Abstract

This article analyzes the phenomenon of polysemy in terminology and its typological classification. It is demonstrated that the existence of polysemy in terminology, as a special layer of the lexicon, is a natural linguistic phenomenon. The study identifies and distinguishes various forms of polysemy. According to the author’s conclusion, the polysemy of terms is not only a source of ambiguity but also an important indicator of the flexibility and dynamic development of scientific language. Its typological analysis has not only theoretical significance but also considerable practical value — in terminography, translation practice, and educational processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Grinev-Grinevich S.V. Terminovedenie. M., 2008 [29].

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980 [30].

Baxtin M.M. Problema rechevyx zhanrov [Tekst] / M.M. Baxtin // Baxtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1984. — S. 250–296.

Borlykova, B. X. «Polisemiya v kalmytskoy muzykal’noy terminologii.» Vestnik KIGI RAN, № 4 (2013): 47–52.

Gorodetskiy B.Yu. Deyatel’nostnaya terminografiya i perevodcheskaya praktika. M.: RAN, 2006 [26].

Zimovaya M.V. Mnogoznachimost’ v terminologii: dis… kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01 – Russkiy yazyk. Orel, 2010. – 160 s [27][28].

Kiseleva S.V., Rosyanova T.S. K postroeniyu tipologii mnogoznachnosti terminov // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2013. № 4 (37). S. 115–122.

Kiseleva, S.V. «Obzor po kognitivnomu issledovaniyu vnutriotraslevoy polisemii.» S. 43–52.

Lantyuxova, N.N., O.V. Zagorovskaya va T.A. Litvinova. “Termin: opredelenie ponyatiya i ego sushchnostnye priznaki.” Vestnik Voronejskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii 1, № 6 (2013): 42–45.

Leychik V.M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura. 3-e izd. M.: LIBROKOM, 2019 [29].

Mechkovskaya N.B. Sotsial’naya lingvistika. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2000. S. 136–137 [4].

Mechkovskaya N.B. Termin kak «sluga dvux gospod» // Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2000, № 4. S. 135–138 [4].

Pchel’tseva, T.V. Metafora v nauke: filosofsko-metodologicheskiy analiz. Moskva, 2008.

Jakobson R.O. Selected Writings (II: Word and Language). The Hague: Mouton, 1971 [21].

Reformatskiy A.A. Vvedenie v yazykoznanie. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1961.

Tatarinov V.A. Novye slova i terminologiya. M.: Nauka, 1996 [31].

Tarnaeva L.P., Malinina S.M., «Osobennosti terminologicheskogo sostava angloyazychnogo diskursa sudovozhdeniya,» Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki 17, № 2 (2024). Izdatel’stvo «Gramota».

Downloads

Published

2025-09-18

How to Cite

Khudoyberdiyeva Gulmira. (2025). Typology Of Polysemy Of Terms And Its Linguistic Features. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(09), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-06-09-03