RETROSPECTIVE PLOT AND COMPOSITIONAL UNITY IN LEO TOLSTOY’S WAR AND PEACE

Authors

  • Gulshod Ibragimovna Khushmanova Senior Lecturer, Department of Russian Language and Literature, University of Economics and Pedagogy, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-05-12-12

Keywords:

Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace, retrospective plot

Abstract

This article examines the retrospective plot structure and compositional unity of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace, exploring how the novel’s temporal dynamics and narrative architecture serve its philosophical and moral vision. Tolstoy’s use of retrospection is not merely a structural device, but a means of integrating personal experience, historical reflection, and moral introspection into a single artistic organism. The study argues that Tolstoy’s composition achieves a unique synthesis of historical epic and psychological realism, where the past continually informs the present, creating a circular sense of time that embodies his view of history as a living moral process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tolstoy, L. N. War and Peace. Trans. Louise and Aylmer Maude. Oxford University Press, 2010.

Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. London: Merlin Press, 1962.

Berlin, Isaiah. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy’s View of History. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1953.

Bayley, John. Tolstoy and the Novel. London: Chatto & Windus, 1966.

Christian, R. F. Tolstoy: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Orwin, Donna Tussing. Tolstoy’s Art and Thought, 1847–1880. Princeton University Press, 1993.

Mandelker, Amy. Framing “War and Peace”: Tolstoy, the Woman Question, and the Victorian Novel. Ohio State University Press, 1993.

Fokin, S. Philosophy and Ethics in Tolstoy’s Prose. Moscow: Nauka, 1988.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Gulshod Ibragimovna Khushmanova. (2024). RETROSPECTIVE PLOT AND COMPOSITIONAL UNITY IN LEO TOLSTOY’S WAR AND PEACE. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(12), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-05-12-12