This article examines the relationship between semiotic units and semiotic means in expressing politeness across linguistic and multimodal communication. Drawing upon linguosemiotic and pragmatic frameworks, the study argues that politeness is a semiotic phenomenon realized through the interaction of verbal, visual, audial, and kinetic signs. Semiotic units encode the conceptual meaning of politeness, while semiotic means actualize it contextually through tone, gesture, gaze, and design. The findings reveal that politeness operates as a multimodal semiotic construct that reflects cultural codes and communicative harmony across societies.
Semiotic Units And Semiotic Means In Relation To Politeness: A Linguosemiotic Analysis
DOI:
Keywords:
Semiotic unit
semiotic means
politeness
multimodality
Abstract
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University
Press.Chandler, D. (2002). Semiotics: The Basics.Routledge.
Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. Edward Arnold.
Herring, S. (2013). Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. De Gruyter Mouton.
Ide, S. (2005). Exploring the Concept of Politeness in Japanese and Other Languages. Multilingual Matters.
Jewitt, C. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. I. B. Tauris.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers. Harvard University Press.
Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2011). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.