Models Of Uzbek–Russian Bilingualism In Urban And Rural Communities Of Tashkent Region

Authors

  • Xakimova Dildora Ikromovna Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages of Faculty of Philology at Alfraganus University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-06-11-08

Keywords:

Uzbek–Russian bilingualism, Tashkent Region, urban and rural communities

Abstract

The article analyzes models of Uzbek–Russian bilingualism in both urban and rural communities within the Tashkent Region, which encompasses industrial towns, peri-urban settlements, and agriculturally focused villages. Although national-level studies frequently characterize Uzbekistan as sociolinguistically homogeneous, this research contends that intra-regional disparities in access to education, media, and mobility generate unique patterns of bilingual language use. The empirical foundation comprises a sociolinguistic survey of two hundred adult residents and forty-five semi-structured interviews executed in one urban center and two rural districts. Descriptive statistics and cluster analysis were used to look at quantitative data, and thematic coding was used to look at qualitative data. The results show that there are three common patterns of Uzbek–Russian bilingualism. The first type, which is mostly found in the industrial town, is balanced pragmatic bilingualism. In this type, speakers use both languages in different situations and connect Russian with broader professional and informational networks and Uzbek with national identity and local solidarity. The second, which is common in cities and suburbs, is Uzbek-dominant bilingualism with functional Russian, where Russian is mostly used for technical and institutional communication. The third, which is common in rural villages, is Uzbek-dominant bilingualism with limited Russian. This means that people in these villages don't use Russian very often and feel very strongly about Uzbek. The research illustrates that these models are influenced by the convergence of location, generation, educational pathways, and linguistic ideologies. It concludes that language policy and educational planning in Uzbekistan must consider intra-regional variation to foster equitable and sustainable bilingualism and the development of multilingualism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker C. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. – 6th ed. – Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2011. – 516 p.

Fishman J. A. Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism // Journal of Social Issues. – 1967. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P. 29–38.

Grosjean F. Bilingual: Life and Reality. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010. – 276 p.

Hornberger N. H. Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings // International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. – 2003. – Vol. 6, № 2. – P. 81–89.

Pavlenko A. Russian in post-Soviet countries // International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. – 2008. – Vol. 11, № 3–4. – P. 275–314.

Smagulova J. Language policies of Kazakhisation and their influence on language attitudes and use // Russian Journal of Communication. – 2008. – Vol. 1, № 2. – P. 190–210.

Suleimanova M. Uzbek–Russian bilingualism in the context of language policy in Uzbekistan // Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences. – 2015. – Vol. 4, № 1. – P. 45–60.

Turaeva Z. Urban bilingual practices in contemporary Tashkent: A sociolinguistic perspective // Language and Society in Central Asia. – 2019. – Vol. 2, № 1. – P. 21–38.

Weber J.-J., Horner K. Introducing Multilingualism: A Social Approach. – 2nd ed. – London: Routledge, 2017. – 234 p.

Woolard K. A. Bilingualism and the nation-state in the post-Soviet era // Annual Review of Anthropology. – 2011. – Vol. 40. – P. 309–328.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Xakimova Dildora Ikromovna. (2025). Models Of Uzbek–Russian Bilingualism In Urban And Rural Communities Of Tashkent Region. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(11), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-06-11-08