Literary Discourse As Moral Laboratory: Reimagining “Crime” And “Justice” Through Cognitive-Linguistic Frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-06-12-03Keywords:
literary discourse, crime, justiceAbstract
This article investigates the concepts of “crime” and “justice” as they are constructed and negotiated within literary discourse, arguing that these notions function not as fixed legal categories but as dynamic, cognitively and culturally mediated constructs. The primary aim of the study is to conceptualize “crime” and “justice” as narrative-based moral phenomena that emerge through language, perspective, and cultural framing rather than through institutional legal definitions. To achieve this aim, the research sets out several objectives: (1) to examine philosophical, psychological, and cognitive-linguistic approaches to crime and justice; (2) to identify dominant discursive and metaphorical patterns through which these concepts are represented in literary texts; and (3) to compare culture- and genre-specific configurations of crime and justice across selected English, American, Russian, and Uzbek works.
Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, theory-driven research design grounded in interpretive and constructivist epistemologies. An interdisciplinary analytical framework is employed, integrating philosophical ethics, moral psychology, discourse analysis, and cognitive linguistics. The analysis proceeds through three stages: conceptual-semantic reconstruction of core moral components (e.g., guilt, responsibility, punishment, restoration); discourse-pragmatic analysis of evaluative language, modality, narrative voice, and focalization; and cognitive-linguistic modeling of underlying conceptual metaphors and blending processes. Comparative analysis is applied to identify both shared and culture-specific patterns in the literary construction of crime and justice.
The findings demonstrate that literary discourse consistently reframes crime as a cognitive-moral process involving intention, justification, and internal conflict rather than a discrete legal violation. Justice, in contrast, is characterized by semantic indeterminacy and narrative postponement, frequently realized through psychological recognition, moral reckoning, or symbolic closure rather than institutional punishment. Across different literary traditions, justice is systematically relocated away from formal legal systems toward narrative meaning-making, although the specific metaphorical models—such as justice as revelation, control, suffering, or survival—vary culturally and generically.
In conclusion, the study argues that literature functions as a cognitive-ethical laboratory in which societies explore moral ambiguity, test competing value systems, and reimagine the relationship between transgression and responsibility. By offering an integrated interdisciplinary model, the article contributes to discourse studies, cognitive linguistics, and literary ethics and provides a theoretical foundation for future comparative and empirical research on moral concepts in narrative discourse.
Downloads
References
Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W.D. Ross & L.Brown, Transls.). Oxford University Press.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Azizov, S. (2024). The interpretation of literary discourse in contemporary linguistics: Linguistic, cognitive, and pragmatic features. Til va adabiyot.uz — Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal, 20, 125–128.
Azizov, S. (2025a). Linguosemantic and pragmatic features of the conceptospheres of “Crime” and “Justice”. Til va adabiyot.uz — Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal, 11, 242–245.
Azizov, S. (2025b). The socio-cultural reflection of the concepts of “crime” and “justice” in human cognition. Philology and Pedagogy, 12(16), 71–73.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Harvard University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A.Sheridan, Transl.). Pantheon Books.
Greene, J.D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin Press.
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. Viking.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Nussbaum, M.C. (1995). Poetic justice: The literary imagination and public life. Beacon Press.
Posner, R.A. (2009). Law and literature (3rd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Narrative identity. Philosophy Today, 35(1), 73–81.
Shklar, J.N. (1986). Legalism: Law, morals, and political trials. Harvard University Press.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Tomasello, M. (2018). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.
Toolan, M. (2012). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford University Press.
van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Solijon Azizov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
