Reconceptualizing ESP Reading Comprehension In Economics Education: A Sociolinguistic And Construction–Integration Perspective

Authors

  • Khudayberdiyeva Dilnovoz PhD student, Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-07-02-16

Keywords:

English for Specific Purposes (ESP), reading comprehension, sociolinguistic approach

Abstract

This study examines the cognitive and emotional factors influencing English for Specific Purposes (ESP) reading comprehension within a sociolinguistic context among first-year economics students. In modern higher education, reading in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) contexts is frequently undervalued, despite its essential contribution to developing professional discourse competence and productive language abilities. The study used a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative questionnaire data with qualitative pedagogical observations to investigate students' reading habits, preferences, and comprehension difficulties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BaronN. S. (2021). How we read now: Strategic choices for print, screen, and audio. Oxford University Press.

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2021). Disciplinary literacy and the construction of academic stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.

Brian, P., & Starfield, S. (2013). The handbook of English for specific purposes. Wiley-Blackwell.

Cazac, V. (2022). The effective use of authentic materials in teaching-learning EMP (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ion Creangă State Pedagogical University, Chişinău, Moldova.

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on reading comprehension in digital vs. print media. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38.

Kargina E.M Каргина Е.М. Чтение как средство развития устной речи в контексте обучения иностранному языку // Современная педагогика. 2015. № 1 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://pedagogika.snauka.ru/2015/01/3317 (дата обращения: 19.02.2026).

Kintsch, W. The Construction–Integration Model of Text Comprehension (modelning izohi/qo‘llanma matni). PDF: 1270-1271

García-Ostbye, I. C., & Martínez-Sáez, A. (2023). Reading challenges in higher education: How suitable are online genres in English for medical purposes? [Journal Name if available], 53–70.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Guerrero, R., Yolanda, N., & Leonor, G. R. (2011). Reading under ESP approach. Hallazgos, 8(15), 199–211.

Hoshimov, U., & Yoqubov, I. (2003). Ingliz tili o‘qitish metodikasi. Sharq Nashriyot-Matbaa Aksiyadorlik Kompaniyasi.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2018). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2021). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Educational Psychologist.

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Radislav, M. P. (2005). English teaching methodology. Drofa.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Xudayberdiyeva, D. (Year). Sotsiolingvistik yondashuvning nofilologik yo‘nalish talabalarining o‘qish ko‘nikmasini takomillashtirishdagi o‘rni. [O‘zMu xabarlari], 213.

Radislav, M.P(2005). English teaching methodology. Moscow: Drofa

Hoshimov U, Yoqubov I “Ingliz tili o‘qitsih metodikasi”-Toshkent:”Sharq Nashriyot-matbaa aksiyadorlik kompaniyasi,2003.-174 b

Downloads

Published

2026-02-21

How to Cite

Khudayberdiyeva Dilnovoz. (2026). Reconceptualizing ESP Reading Comprehension In Economics Education: A Sociolinguistic And Construction–Integration Perspective. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 7(02), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-07-02-16