IDENTIFICATION OF ERRORS IN STUDENTS' PRONUNCIATION USING THE PRINCIPLE OF APPROXIMATION IN THE TEACHING OF PRONUNCIATION, THE STUDY OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE ON THEIR ORIGIN AND THE ELIMINATION OF EXISTING PRONUNCIATION PROBLEMS
Abstract
This article was composed to improve showing English elocution. The point is to study the angles that impact the language learning measure. Subsequently, we need to investigate some basic troubles that Uzbek understudies experience while learning the way to express English sounds. The article covers various continuous articulation troubles that mess up Uzbek students of English. These challenges incorporate tense and remiss vowels, consonant endings, stress and tones. It is a valuable reference hotspot for the two educators and understudies who need to improve their way to express English.
Keywords
Pronunciation, teaching technologies, problems in pronunciation, consonants, vowels, innovative methods, intonation, sound frameworkHow to Cite
References
J. D. O’Connor “Better English Pronunciation” Cambridge University Press. Second edition. 1980. p.70.
Patsy M. Lightbown, Nina Spada “How Languages are Learned” Oxford University Press. Third edition 2010. p.2.
Frederika Gebhard “English Pronunciation” The second edition 2010–2011. p. 14
Nguyen Tien Dung, Faculty of Foreign Languages, the professor of Ba Ria — Vung Tau University, from his lecture
Marion Williams, Tony Wright “A Course in Language Teaching” Cambridge University Press. First edition, 1999. p.22.
Jamol Jalolov. "Methods of teaching foreign languages". Toshkent 1996. pp. 178.179.
Bamgbose, A. (1998). ‘Torn between the norms: innovations in world Englishes’. World Englishes 17,1, 1-14.
Beebe, L. & Giles, H. (1984). ‘Speech-accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second-language acquisition’. In H. Giles (Ed.) International Journal of the Sociology of Language. The Dynamics of Speech Accommodation. Amsterdam: Mouton.
Bent T. & Bradlow, A. (2003). ‘The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114, 1600-1610.
Bowler, B. & Cunningham, S. (1999). Headway Pronunciation Course. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradford, B. (1996, Summer). ‘Upspeak’. Speak Out! Newsletter of the IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group, 18, 22-24.
Bradford, B. (1988). Intonation in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Brett, D. (2002). ‘Improved Vowel Production with the PRAAT Programme’. In D.Teeler (Ed.).
Brown, A. (1997). Use of English in Teaching. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Brown, A., Deterding, D., & Low, E.L. (2000).The English Language in Singapore. Research on Pronunciation. Singapore: Singapore Association of Applied Linguistics.
Burton J. & Clennell, C. (Eds.) (2003). Interaction and Language Learning. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Bekchanovna, T. S. (2019). Constitutional and legal regulation of mass media and study of public opinion. Вопросы науки и образования, (23 (71)).
Zakirova, S. A., Pîrvan, L. R., & Zunnunova, U. G. (2020). CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS IN ART HIGHER EDUCATION OF UZBEKISTAN AND ROMANIA. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences (EJRRES), 8, 10.
Kultashev, B., Sadikova, S., & Kultasheva, N. (2021). Development of Portrait of Uzbekistan During the Early 20thCentury. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 2040-2053.
Sayfullaev, N. (2019). Current Issues on Fine ARTS Education: Continuity and Prospects for Development. Religación, 4, 192-194.
