LINGUISTIC INVESTIGATION ON THE THEORETICAL OF LOGICAL COMPOSITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-02-10-07Keywords:
Logical composition, Theoretical, Syntactic Blunders, DiaryAbstract
This exploration was subjective in nature. The information were gathered by perception and documentation, and afterward broke down by Miles and Huberman model. The outcome showed that the recurrence of linguistic mistakes in harmony was 40%, word request was 25%, spelling was17%, equal construction was 12 %, and student language was 6%. To summarize, there were still some linguistic mistakes in the edited compositions of logical writing in the diaries.
Downloads
References
Dennis, B., 2000. The Victorian Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanders, M., 2005. American Modernism and the New Negro Renaissance. In: W. Kalaidjian, ed. The Cambridge Companion to American Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.129-156.
Swinburne, A. C., 1880. A study of Shakespeare. 2nd edn. London: Chatto & Windus, p.188, Available from: https://ia802606.us.archive.org/21/items/astudyshakespea 02swingoog/astudyshakespea02swingoog.pdf.
Sanders, E., 2006. The Body of the Actor in Coriolanus. Shakespeare Quarterly, 57(4), pp. 387-412.
Köhler, A., 2007. Social Class of the Mid-Victorian Period and Its Values. Norderstedt: Grin Verlag
Corder, S.P (1981).Error Analysis and Interlanguage.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
