A PROGRESSIVE TECHNIQUE FOR SHOWING ENGLISH AS A SUBSEQUENT LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-03-04-02Keywords:
Letter-by-letter strategy, TechniqueAbstract
We have distinguished difficult issues including literal interpretation and phonemic educating, and we then, at that point, recommend that we don't utilize the IPA or literal interpretation while instructing English. We present a draft of a technique that utilizes our ears and information all things being equal.
Downloads
References
Krashen, S. D. and Terrell, T. D. (1995). The Natural Approach. Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice Hall Europe. ISBN: 0-13-609934-3.
Sinha, Manoj Kumar and Satpathy, Kishor Chandra (2004). Library Automation and Networking for Managing Library Information Services. Indian Journal of Information, Library and Society (IJLIS), vol. 17 (3-4), pp.118-13.
Mishra, R. K. (February 2000). Resource Sharing; The Third Dimension of Library Automation, ALIBER- Chennai.
Siemens, G., and Conole G. (2011). Connectivism: Design and delivery of social networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12(3), i – iv.
Preble, J.F., Reichel, A. and Hoffman, R.C. (2000). Strategic alliances for competitive advantage: Evidence from Israel’s hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 19(3), 327-341.
M. Armbrust, A. Fox, R. Griffith, A.D. Joseph, D. Petterson, A. Rabkin, I. Stoica, and M. Zaharia. “Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Comuting. Tech. rep., US Berkeley Reliable Adapive Distributed Systems Laboratory. 2009.
Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.
Hasan, S., Komur, S. (2008), “The relationship between critical thinking skills and in-class questioning behaviours of English language teaching students”, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol: 31 Iss:4. pp 389-402.
