Pedagogical Foundations For Forming Research Competence In Pre-Service Computer Science Teachers In A Digital Learning Environment

Authors

  • Axatqulov Anvar Almasovich Lecturer at Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-07-02-10

Keywords:

Research competence, pre-service computer science teachers, digital learning environment

Abstract

Preparing pre-service computer science (CS) teachers for contemporary schooling requires more than mastery of programming and didactics; it also demands research competence that enables future teachers to diagnose learning needs, evaluate digital tools, interpret educational data, and improve instruction through evidence-informed inquiry. This article develops a pedagogically grounded framework for forming research competence in pre-service CS teachers within a digital learning environment. Drawing on the teacher-as-researcher tradition, pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration models, and inquiry-oriented learning theory, the paper conceptualizes research competence as an integrated construct that unites epistemic understanding of research, methodological skills, digital-data literacy, ethical responsibility, and reflective professional judgment. The digital learning environment is considered not merely as a set of technologies but as a didactic ecosystem that amplifies authentic inquiry through access to open resources, collaboration networks, analytics, virtual laboratories, and reproducible workflows. Methodologically, the study follows an integrative conceptual approach that synthesizes peer-reviewed scholarship and international competence frameworks to derive design principles and pedagogical conditions for teacher education programs. The results include a coherent model of pedagogical foundations that links learning outcomes, learning activities, mentorship patterns, and assessment logic, and it identifies how scaffolding, community presence, and research–teaching integration can be operationalized through digital platforms. The discussion highlights implementation risks, including superficial tool use, unequal access, and ethical challenges, and proposes mitigation through curriculum alignment, staged inquiry, and transparent assessment criteria. The article concludes that sustainable formation of research competence depends on a program-level design in which digital affordances are intentionally matched to inquiry cycles, professional identity development, and the epistemic culture of computer science education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shulman, L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching // Educational Researcher. 1986. Vol. 15, No. 2. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. Vol. 108, No. 6. P. 1017–1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education // The Internet and Higher Education. 2000. Vol. 2, No. 2–3. P. 87–105.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. Researching the Community of Inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions // The Internet and Higher Education. 2007. Vol. 10, No. 3. P. 157–172.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) // Educational Psychologist. 2007. Vol. 42, No. 2. P. 99–107. DOI: 10.1080/00461520701263368.

Cochran-Smith, M., Lytle, S. L. Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities // Review of Research in Education. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 249–305.

Borg, S. Language teacher research engagement // Language Teaching. 2010. Vol. 43, No. 4. P. 391–429.

Healey, M. Linking research and teaching: Disciplinary spaces // In: Barnett, R. (ed.) Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005. P. 30–42.

UNESCO. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Version 3. Paris: UNESCO, 2018. 68 p. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 (accessed: 07.02.2026).

Redecker, C., Punie, Y. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. (JRC Science for Policy Report). Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC107466/pdf_digcomedu_a4_final.pdf (accessed: 07.02.2026).

Siemens, G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. 2005. Available at: https://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm (accessed: 07.02.2026).

UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). Paris: UNESCO, 2019. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer (accessed: 07.02.2026).

The Design-Based Research Collective. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry // Educational Researcher. 2003. Vol. 32, No. 1. P. 5–8, 35–37. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005.

Reeves, T. C. Design research from a technology perspective // In: van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., Nieveen, N. (eds.) Educational Design Research. London: Routledge, 2006. P. 52–66.

OECD. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. OECD Learning Framework 2030. P

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Axatqulov Anvar Almasovich. (2026). Pedagogical Foundations For Forming Research Competence In Pre-Service Computer Science Teachers In A Digital Learning Environment. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 7(02), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-07-02-10