Designing A Sustainable Society Oriented Cultural Foreign Language Course: A Needs Analysis of Preservice English Teachers
Keywords:
Needs analysis, preservice English teachers, intercultural citizenship, sustainability educationAbstract
This study develops a sustainability-oriented, culture-integrated foreign language course design framework grounded in a needs analysis of preservice English teachers. Building on intercultural communicative competence and intercultural citizenship traditions in language education, the article argues that sustainability is not an “add-on topic” but a meaning-making domain that reconfigures what counts as communicative competence, cultural understanding, and ethical participation in multilingual societies (Byram, 1997; Byram, 2008; Baker, 2012; Adami, 2025). Conceptually, the study links education for sustainable development, ecological literacy, and critical pedagogy to the cultural and intercultural goals of ELT, proposing that preservice teachers’ course needs emerge at the intersection of three pressures: (1) curriculum demands to address global and local sustainability challenges, (2) learners’ lived cultural contexts and identity negotiation, and (3) the professional requirement to teach language as social action rather than only linguistic form (Andersson et al., 2013; Burmeister et al., 2013; Capra, 2007; Focho, 2010; Freire, 2016). Methodologically, the article outlines a qualitative needs analysis approach using interview and reflective narrative protocols complemented by document analysis of course requirements and artifacts. Thematic analysis procedures guide interpretation, enabling identification of preservice teachers’ perceived gaps in intercultural pedagogy, sustainability literacy, and pedagogical language for facilitating difficult conversations around crisis, responsibility, and justice (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Charalambous et al., 2025). Results are presented as a descriptive synthesis of likely needs patterns and course design implications drawn strictly from the provided research base, emphasizing culturally specific teaching realities, embodied and affective intercultural communication, service-learning potentials, readability demands for accessible materials, and project-based global issues pedagogy (Anas et al., 2025; Carstensen, 2025; Chung, 2025; Cates & Jacobs, 2006; DuBay, 2004; Flesch, 1948). The article concludes with a course architecture that aligns intercultural citizenship aims with sustainability education through critical literacy, locally situated cultural inquiry, and reflective assessment practices suitable for teacher education programs (Balıkcıoğlu Akkuş & Uysal, 2024; Arıkan & Zorba, 2024).
Downloads
References
Adami, E. (2025). Culture and interculturality as non-/sharing: Meaning-making beyond discourse. Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2524699
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57
Anas, I., Rahayu, De Vega, N., & Samsudin. (2025). Situating English language teaching in culturally specific contexts: A narrative case study into teachers’ intercultural experiences. Language and Intercultural Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2584150
Andersson, K., Jagers, S., Lindskog, A., & Martinsson, J. (2013). Learning for the future? Effects of education for sustainable development (ESD) on teacher education students. Sustainability, 5(12), 5135–5152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5125135
Arıkan, A., & Zorba, M. G. (2024). Raising pre-service English language teachers’ awareness of sustainable development goals through literary texts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(8), 1681–1695. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2023-0256
Baker, W. (2012). From cultural awareness to intercultural awareness: Culture in ELT. ELT Journal, 66, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr017
Balıkcıoğlu Akkuş, G., & Uysal, H. H. (2024). Empowering tomorrow’s educators: Critical literacy journeys of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202429986
Biçer, A., & Yıldırım, Ş. (2023). Comparison of epistemological beliefs, teaching-learning conceptions, and self-efficacy of pre-service and in-service EFL teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322958
Boonteerarak, P., Khueansri, S., & Hkawng, Z. H. (2025). Integrating intercultural competency in English for general education in a Thai university: A document analysis of course syllabi. Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.62819/jel.2025.1175
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burmeister, M., Schmidt-Jacob, S., & Eilks, I. (2013). German chemistry teachers’ understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development—An interview case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20137B
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690807
Byrne, J. (2011). The human relationship with nature: Rights of animals and plants in the urban context. In I. Douglas, D. Goode, M. C. Houck, & R. Wang (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of urban ecology (pp. 63–73). Routledge.
Capra, F. (2007). Sustainable living, ecological literacy, and the breath of life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 9–18.
Carstensen, K. A. H. (2025). Learning beyond language: An ethnographic study of language socialization in English conversation groups. Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2024.2430467
Cates, K., & Jacobs, G. M. (2006). Global issues projects in the English language classroom. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 167–180). Information Age Publishing.
Charalambous, C., Zembylas, M., & Aristidou, X. (2025). Rethinking intercultural communication beyond verbal language: Affect, embodiment and materiality in times of ‘crisis’. Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2552529
Chung, B. (2025). Developing intercultural communication competence through multinational service-learning program. ESP Review, 7(2), 47–66.
Davis, R. D. (2013). A place for ecopedagogy in community literacy. Community Literacy Journal, 7(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.25148/clj.7.2.009350
Duailibi, M. (2006). Ecological literacy: What are we talking about? Convergence, 39(4), 65–68.
DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability (ED490073). ERIC.
Ducarme, F. (2021). What is nature? Encyclopedia of the Environment. http://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/?p=12392
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
Focho, G. N. (2010). Language as tool for a global education: Bridging the gap between the traditional and a global curriculum. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 3(1), 135–148.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Maren K. Hoffmann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
