Interactive Education in Higher and Secondary Schools of Uzbekistan: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Interactive Methods, Challenges and Prospects

Authors

  • Farrukh Razakov Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Physical Education at Bucheon University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-07-04-10

Keywords:

Interactive learning, traditional learning, competency-based approach

Abstract

This article examines the transition from traditional to interactive learning in higher and secondary education in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Drawing on policy documents, theoretical frameworks, and pedagogical practices, the study explores the nature, advantages, and specific features of interactive teaching methods. A comparative analysis of traditional and interactive approaches is conducted, and practical examples of implementation in universities and schools are presented. The paper identifies key challenges hindering the adoption of interactive methods and outlines future development prospects in the context of educational digitalization. Practical recommendations for the systematic integration of interactive technologies are proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dewey, J. (2010). Democracy and Education. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press.

Ismoilova, S. B. (2025). Active and interactive teaching methods in modern schools. Young Scientist, (4), 112–115.

Yuldasheva, G. I. (2025). The relevance of interactive learning in higher education in Uzbekistan. Innovations in Pedagogy and Psychology, (2), 45–51.

Karimova, S. (2019). The use of interactive methods in teaching Russian. Economics and Society, (11), 34–38.

Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (2014). Freedom to Learn. Moscow: Smysl.

Selevko, G. K. (2006). Modern Educational Technologies. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie.

Turabaeva, G. K., et al. (2015). Modern Interactive Teaching Methods. Tashkent: Fan va texnologiya.

Khalilova, S. T., & Turgunboev, J. T. (2025). Interactive learning in innovative educational systems. Oriental Renaissance, (1), 202–208.

Kholikulova, N. T. (2024). The role of interactive teaching methods. Science and Education, (3), 560–565.

Shedina, S. V., & Tereshina, N. S. (2022). Traditional and interactive learning. Science, Technology and Education, (2), 77–81.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Farrukh Razakov. (2026). Interactive Education in Higher and Secondary Schools of Uzbekistan: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Interactive Methods, Challenges and Prospects. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 7(04), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-07-04-10

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 04 (2026): Volume 07 Issue 04

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Farrukh Razakov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.