INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL TERMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Sunnatullo A. Xo’jakulov Lecturer, Karshi state university, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-03-11-07

Keywords:

Legal term, legal language, ambiguity

Abstract

This article discusses abundant legal terms and law words in connection with lexical and semantic features of them in diverse context. It is entirely important to identify linguistic feature of legal terms to reach absolute or adequate translation of legal texts and legal terms. The use of language is crucial to any legal system, not only in the same way that it is crucial to politics in general, but also in two special respects. Legal language is the language which is used by the people (like lawyers and other legal professionals), engaged in legal profession. Like English and Uzbek languages, legal language itself is now a global phenomenon. It contains a number of unusual features which are related to Terminology, linguistic structure, and linguistic conventions. Due to its rich vocabulary, we find many problems in legal language like “ambiguity”, “multiple meaning”, and “doubtfulness in its contents”[1]. The article conveys numerous English and Uzbek legal terms and their lexical features.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of the Law. Brown Publishing House.

Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press.

Pigolkin А.S. The language of the law – М. 1990.

Kuchimov Sh.N. Language of Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 1995.

O’zbekiston yuridik ensiklopediyasi (R. Muhiddinov va boshqalar). Toshkent, 2002

Kuchimov Sh.N. Language of Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 1995.

Coughlin, George G. JR Your Handbook of Everyday Law , New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1993

Longman legal dictionary

Downloads

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Sunnatullo A. Xo’jakulov. (2022). INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL TERMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 3(11), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-03-11-07