COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF PREPOSITONS IN JAPANESE AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Abstract
In linguistics, the comparison of languages has always been in the center of attention. Although it is recognized by scholars that Japanese and Uzbek belong to the same language family, the Altaic language family, grammatical phenomena in both languages are not the same. While both languages have similarities, they also have differences. Comparing languages belonging to the same language family involves studying the phenomena that occur in that language. The category of agreement is widely observed in both languages, but there are some agreements between Japanese agreement agreements, which are given with one agreement in Uzbek, and the scope of application is narrow. The category of consonants is widely observed in both languages, but there are some consonants among the Japanese suffixes, which are given with one consonant in Uzbek, and the scope of application is also narrow. This article provides a comparative analysis of the Uzbek suffix of the accusative case and the differences between them
Keywords
agreement, [ni] agreement suffix, [e] the suffix of agreement;, morphological means, spaceHow to Cite
References
庵 功雄2001『新しい日本語学入門ことばのしくもを考える」ズリーエネットワーク』142p.
庵 功雄・高梨信乃・中西久美子・山田敏弘 2001『中上級を教える人のための日本語ハンドブック』600p.
庵功雄・高梨信乃・中西久美子・山田敏弘2000『初級を教える人のための 日本語ハンドブック』株式会社 443p.
竹内美智子1973『副詞とは何か」 『品詞別 日本文法講座５』明治書院198p.
上級レベルニュウアプロチ2002東京 – 258 p.
森山新2008『日本語習得・教育研究への認知言語学の応用可能性』論文12p.
石綿敏雄1990『対照言語学』桜風社 200p.
入江相政1981『生き行きて』中英公論社 –15p
Zikrillaev G. (1994) Morphology of the Uzbek language. – Bukhara: – p. 163. (Зикриллаев Ғ. Ўзбек тили морфологияси. – Бухоро: нашриётсиз, 1994. –163б.
Khayrullaev Kh. (2001) Word, phrase and relation of sentence to predicative: Candidate of Philological Sciences. Diss. – Samarkand: – p. 138. (Хайруллаев Х. Сўз, сўз бирикмаси ва гапнинг предикативликка муносабати: Филол. фан. номз…дисс. – Самарқанд, 2001. –138б.)
Khudaybergenova Z. (2007) Scientific interpretation of monotaxems in Uzbek and Turkish languages: Candidate of Philological Sciences. Diss. – Tashkent: – p. 300. (Худайбергенова З. Ўзбек ва турк тилларидаги монотаксемаларнинг илмий талқини: Филол. фан. ном…дисс. – Тошкент, 2007. –300б.)
Hojiev A. (2002) Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. – Tashkent: National encyclopedia of Uzbekistan. – p. 163. (Ҳожиев А. Тилшунослик терминларнинг изоҳли луғати. –Т.: Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси, 2002. –163 б.)
Sayfullaeva R. and others. (2009) Modern Uzbek literary language. – Tashkent: Teacher. – p. 383. (Сайфуллаева Р. ва бошқалар. Ҳозирги ўзбек адабий тили. – Т.: Ўқитувчи, 2009. –Б.383.)
Хадсон, Рикуко Эндо, Джунко Кондо, Йошими Сакакибара. Mu joshi no shudai shugo mokuteki-go. 2001. – p. 104.
