The article analyzes the typical features of the “person who writes” in modern Russian-language prose through the prism of the triad “image of the world – image of the word – image of the artist”. It has been revealed that this image represents both the signs of a new hero, self-criticizing, conducting a dialogue with his alter ego, consolidating efforts with other artists, and the specifics of the modern world, combining the memory of the historical past and grading the ennobling effect of the word.

Russian-language literature, antithesis, image of words

[Alimova 2021] - Alimova N.Kh. Mul'tikul'turalizm i “novyye amerikantsy” v modern amerikanskoy literature // Polish Journal of Science, No. 36—2, 2021, P. 36—39.)

[Davshan 2012]-Davshan AN Tvorchestvo Mihaila Prishvina v kontekste mirovoy literature. Tashkent, 2012.)

[Gibraltarskaya 2023] – Gibraltarskaja ON Obraz mira v sovremennoy russkoyazychnoy proze // Imagologiya i comparativistika. 2023. No. 20. P. 363—384.

[Kamilova 2016] – Kamilova S.Je. Sovremennyy rasskaz: soderzhatel'nye vektory i povestvovatel'nye strategii. Tashkent, 2016.

[Krivoruchko 2008] – Krivoruchko A. Yu. Jekfrasis kak model' iskusstva v proizvedeniyah IA Bunina, BA Lavreneva, VA Kaverina // Izvestiyja Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. AI Gercena, No. 73—1, 2008, P. 254—257.

[Leiderman 2015] –Lejderman NL Russkoyazychnaya literatura – perekrestok kul'tur // Filologicheskiy klass, No. 3(41), 2015, P. 19—24.

[Malysheva 2000] –Malysheva LG Evolyuciya obraza hudozhnika v nemeckoy novelle XIX century // Vestnik TGPU, No. 6(22), 2000, P. 15—17.

[Ovçarenko A., Çaylak H. 2016] –Ovçarenko A., Çaylak H. O role i meste hudozhnika v russkoy literature 1920—1930s godov: Pojeziya. Obshhiy ocherk // Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, No. 4(8), 2016, P. 50—62.