ENHANCING WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS THROUGH BLENDED LEARNING: A MODEL FOR SUCCESS
Abstract
This study explores the potential of a blended learning model to enhance entrepreneurial skills among women, focusing on integrating online and face-to-face educational methods to create a flexible, effective, and accessible approach to skill development. The proposed model combines digital resources, interactive online modules, mentorship, and in-person workshops tailored to address the unique challenges and opportunities faced by women entrepreneurs. By offering a mix of theoretical knowledge, practical application, and real-time feedback, this approach empowers women with the necessary skills in areas such as business planning, financial literacy, digital marketing, and strategic decision-making. The study evaluates the model’s effectiveness through case studies, surveys, and performance metrics, highlighting the positive impact on learners’ confidence, business acumen, and networking abilities. Findings indicate that a blended learning approach not only fosters essential entrepreneurial skills but also encourages continuous learning and adaptability, key factors for success in today’s dynamic business environment. This research underscores the significance of blended learning as a powerful tool for promoting women's empowerment, economic participation, and entrepreneurial growth.
Keywords
Blended learning, Women’s entrepreneurship, Skill developmentHow to Cite
References
Adams, K. (2005, September). The sources of innovation and creativity. A paper commissioned by the National Center on Education and the Economy for the New Commission on the skills of the American Workforce. National Center on Education and the Economy.
Amabile T. & Kramer, S. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy engagement, and creativity at work. USA: Harvard Business Review Press
Barkley, E. F. (2018). Terms of engagement: Understanding and promoting student engagement in today’s college classroom. Singapore: Springer.
Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Curtis, D., & McKenzie, P. (2001). Employability skills for Australian industry: Literature review and framework development. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hökfelt, T., Johansson, O., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Chemical anatomy of the brain. Science, 225(4668), 1326-1334.
Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional designs for distance education. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 247-258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2007). OECD framework for the evaluation of SME and entrepreneurship policies and programmes. Paris: Author.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, percieved cognitive learning, and asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
Stenberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. UK: Cambridge University Press .
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shivani Jalgawkar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
